AP World History 2012-2013
  • Unit 1
    • 1.1.3: Tools and Adaptation>
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 1.3.9 & 1.3.2: New Religions & Geographies of Early Civs.>
      • Early Religions>
        • AGMSPRITE Analysis
        • Works Cited
      • The Early Civilizations>
        • Case Study
        • AGMSPRITE Analysis
        • Works Cited
    • 1.1.2: Humans and Fire>
      • 1.1.4: Economic Structures>
        • Case Study
        • AGMSPRITE Analysis
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 1.3.6: Arts & Record Keeping>
      • Arts and Artisanship
      • Systems of Recordkeeping
      • Case Study: The Phoenician Alphabet
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 1.3.1-1.3.3: Early Culture & Systems of Rule>
      • Culture's Effects
      • Systems of Rule
      • Case Study: Hammurabi's Code
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 1.1-1.4 Early Human Innovation>
      • 1.1.1: Human Patterns of Migration>
        • Case Study
        • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 1.2.1-1.2.3: The Climate & The Neolithic Era>
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 1.2.5-1.2.6: Reliable Food Sources & Innovation>
      • Case Study - The Plow
      • Works Cited
    • 1.3.1-1.3.2: Pastoralists & Early Architecture>
      • Introduction
      • Monumental Architecture And Urban Planning
      • Pastoralist Weapon Dissemination And Transportation
      • Pastoralist Tools
      • Basic
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
      • Works Cited
  • Unit 2
    • 2.2.5-2.2.7 Social Hierarchy and Gender Roles>
      • Gender Roles>
        • Case Study
        • AGMSPRITE Analysis
      • Social Hierarchies >
        • AGMSPRITE
    • 2.2.4 Cities>
      • Trade>
        • Trade AGMSPRITE
        • Trade Case Study
      • Religious Rituals>
        • Religious Rituals AGMSPRITE
        • Religious Rituals Case Study
      • Public Administration>
        • Public Administration AGMSPRITE
        • Public Administration Case Study
    • 2.2.2 Orchestration of the Persian and S. Asian Empires>
      • Persia>
        • Imperial Administration and Legal Systems
        • Military Power
        • Trade and Economic Integration and Regulation
        • AGMSPRITE Analysis
      • South Asia>
        • Imperial Administration and Legal Systems
        • Military Power
        • Trade and Economic Integration and Regulation
        • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 2.2.2 Orchestration of Rome and China>
      • China>
        • Imperial Administration
        • Military Power
        • Trade and Economics
        • AGMSPRITE Analysis
      • Rome>
        • Imperial Administration
        • Military Power
        • Trade and Economics
        • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 2.2.1: Growth of Empires & States>
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE
    • 2.1.6 Cultures Of Second Wave Civilizations>
      • Sculptures
      • Architecture
      • Literature
      • A.G.M.S.P.R.I.T.E
      • Sources
    • 2.1.1: Religions as a Bonding Force>
      • The Basic Gist
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
      • Case Study
    • 2.1.4 Buddhism and Hinduism Impact on Gender Roles>
      • Buddhism
    • 2.1.2 The Emergence of Religions>
      • Christianity
      • Confucianism
      • Greco-Roman Philosophy
      • Daoism
      • AGMSPRITE
  • Unit 3
    • 3.1.1 Third Wave Global Trade Routes>
      • Basic Gist
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 3.1.2 The Impact of trade on emerging trading cities>
      • Basic Gist
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 3.1.3. Spread of Islam Through Afro-Eurasia>
      • Basic Gist
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE
    • 3.1.4 Inter-Regional Travelers >
      • The Basic Gist
      • Compare and Contrast
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 3.1.5. Cultural Interactions and Art>
      • The Basic Gist
      • Cultural Traditions AGMSPRITE
      • Art AGMSPRITE
      • Literature AGMSPRITE
      • Case Study
    • 3.1.6: The Impact of Newly Spread Technologies and Scientific Knowledge>
      • Basic Gist
      • Movement of Gunpowder from East to West
      • Movement of Printing from East to West
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 3.1.7 Inter-Regional Conflicts>
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
  • Unit 4
    • 4.1.1. - Influence of Tools Upon Transoceanic Trade>
      • Basic Gist
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE
    • 4.1.2: Maritime Reconnaissance>
      • Basic Gist
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 4.1.3 World Economies>
      • Basic Gist
      • AGMSPRITE analysis
      • Case Study
    • 4.1.4 The Colossal Impact of the Colombian Exchange>
      • Basic Gist
      • Case Study on Sugar
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis of the East
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis of the West
    • 4.1.5 Government and the Arts>
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE
    • 4.2.3 Forced Migration of Africans Cause and Effect>
      • Basic Gist
      • Causes of the forced migration of Africans
      • Effects/Developments of the forced migration of Africans
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 4.3.2 Impact of Technology on state consolidation and imperial expansion>
      • Basic Gist
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE
  • Unit 5
    • 5.3.1 US and Latin American Revolutions >
      • Basic Gist
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE
    • 5.3.2b Hatian Revolution>
      • Basic Gist
      • AGMSPRITE
    • 5.3.2a: Causes and Effects of French Revolution>
      • Causes of the French Revolution
      • Effects of the French Revolution
      • AGMSPRITE
    • 5.3.2c Causes and Effects of the Mexican Revolution>
      • Basic Gist
      • Causes of the Mexican Revolution
      • Effects of the Mexican Revolution
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 5.3.3: The Winds of Change>
      • Case Study
      • The Conception of Nation-States
      • Nationalism on the Rise
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 5.3.4 Nationalism and Democracy >
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE
      • 5.3.5 Enlightenment and European Despots>
        • Basic Gist
  • Unit 6
    • War and Peace in a Global Context>
      • Big Gist>
        • WWI vs WWII
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE
    • Changing Economics>
      • Basic Gist
      • AGMSPRITE
      • Case Study
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE
    • Demographic and Environmental Changes>
      • Basic Gist
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE Analysis
    • 20th Century Globalization>
      • Basic Gist
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE
    • Effects of Revolutions on Women>
      • Basic Gist
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE
    • New Patterns of Nationalism >
      • Basic Gist
      • Independence of Vietnam Case Study
      • Effects of Communism Case Study
      • Chinese and Russian Revolutions
      • AGMSPRITE
    • Globalization of Science, technology and culture. >
      • Basic Gist
      • Case Study
      • AGMSPRITE

Systems of Rule in Early Civilizations 

Shang Dynasty

Picture
Map of the Shang Dynasty
The Shang Dynasty, roughly from 1600 to 1050 BCE, took place in the middle of China’s bronze age and was the first Chinese Dynasty to be known to leave behind written records and archeological evidence of its existence. Much of what is known about the Shang Dynasty’s system of rule is because of oracle bones found with inscriptions confirming names of kings and describing the style of government used during this time. The dynasty’s first capital is said to have been established in a town called Shang by Cheng Tang. Archeological evidence suggest that although the capital was moved many more times, Shang continued to remain the ancestral capital of the dynasty. This is where the Shang kings kept their most prized possessions such as sacred ancestral temples, tablets and regalia. The Shang capital never moved although the political capitals, where the kings lived and ruled from, often moved. In the Shang dynasty there was a king who had supreme power over everything, including religion and the life and work of the peasants. However, because the Shang Dynasty was so large and the king could not rule over every separate part of the dynasty, he appointed nobles (who were usually the king’s relatives) to rule the other parts. The Shang political system was organized into a hierarchy involving different levels of ranks where the king and other nobles were at the top of the social spectrum, while peasants, who had very little power, were at the bottom of the social spectrum. The people of the Shang Dynasty had to give a portion of their harvest to the king which shows how people low on the social hierarchy had very little power. The Shang dynasty also had job specialization. One job that had a profound effect on the Shang government’s ability to rule was writing because it allowed the government to communicate on a large scale to the state’s many territories. Communication was key for the Shang Dynasty since it was constantly at war because the king wanted prisoners (for servants) and also new territory. However, even with writing as a great source of communication between the different territories of the Shang Dynasty, it finally came to an end in 1050 BCE when the Zhou conquerors took over saying that the Shang king was evil and should not rule anymore.



Picture
Oracle bones found from the Shang Dynasty held information like the names of kings and style of government that was present during this time period.

 

Egyptian Civilization

Picture
Egyptian Pyramid
The Egyptian people (circa 2000-1000 BCE)  were ruled by a Pharaoh who was the monarch of the country and had complete control over the land and its resources. The pharaoh also had command over the military, the government and the legal system in which he enacted laws and maintained law and order (this was a concept the ancient Egyptians referred to as Ma’at). But the pharaoh did not lead completely alone; he relied on many officials to manage his affairs. For example, in charge of the administration was his second in command, the vizier, who acted as the king's representative and coordinated land surveys, the treasury, building projects, the legal system and the archives.  Along with the pharaoh and the vizier, each administrative region (the country was divided into as many as 42) was governed by a nomarch who was accountable to the vizier. Egypt had a strong social hierarchy where the pharaohs were at the top. Because these Egyptian kings could put members of family in charge of administration, much of the pharaoh’s family was in power. Pharaohs also passed on their power to their sons and this created a large separation between the kings and their family and the common people. However, Egyptians viewed the Pharaoh as being born by the Gods and immaculately conceived so that anything the Pharaoh said was a God-given order and must be followed. This allowed for the Pharaoh to create a system of government where the high social class benefitted without the low social class protesting. 


Picture
Much of the information known about Egypt's system of government comes from the bodies found of ancient pharaohs such as the one pictured who is said to be Ramses II.

Mesopotamia

Picture
Map of Mesopotamia
The Mesopotamians are credited with having invented the centralized state and the developed kingship. Each king passed down their leadership so that power continued to stay in the family. Mesopotamia’s cities are where much of the politics occurred. As Mesopotamia began to grow, many of its city-states converged to become kingdoms. This brought people together and created a more centralized government. Mesopotamians are also believed to have started government bureaucracies because instead of farmers paying taxes, they paid tithes. Scribes and palace officials handled daily government affairs including the tithes made by these farmers. One thing that sets Mesopotamia apart from Egypt and the Shang Dynasty is that King Hammurabi created a set of rules circa 1700 BCE called The Laws of Hammurabi. These laws created rules that the people had to follow or face punishment for disobeying. He had the laws inscribed on stone and then placed in temples throughout cities. Mesopotamians believed the laws came from the gods so they must be followed. And although Hammurabi’s laws were supposed to protect the weak, people with high social statues received more mild punishments if they were to break a law where a person with a low social status suffered great consequences for disobeying.  

Picture
The Law of Hammurabi was a set of rules that people were required to follow. If people disobeyed this set of rules they were punished.

Indus River Valley- Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro 

Picture
Statue of a Priest in Mohenjo-Daro
The Indus River Valley (circa 3000-1500 BCE) was home to two major civilizations: The Harappa civilization and the Mohenjo-Daro civilization. Very little is known about these two cities and their systems of rule because their writing is still undeciphered. What is known about these two civilizations and their systems of rule is that they were remarkably similar although they were hundreds of miles apart. Both Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro were built in a grid pattern that was divided into twelve more grids. The grid in both cities suggests orderly government and planning. Both cities also had 3 classes: the highest class was dominated by priests and merchants, the middle class held the less-successful merchants and artisans, while the lowest class consisted of laborers including farmers. The priests were the speakers for the Gods and used this “power” as a way to maintain control over the people. Both Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro consisted of administration buildings, markets, storage areas, workshops, houses and temples. All of these buildings show job specialization because as farming techniques became better, a food surplus was created, requiring fewer farmers and thus allowing people to pursue other careers such as merchants, scribes, priests and laborers. 


Picture
Remains from the Harappa civilization allow for a greater understanding of how this civilization functioned by looking at the layout of the city

Works Cited 

Guisepi, R. A. "Indus River Valley Civilizations." Indus River Valley Civilizations. N.p., no date. Web. 05 Oct. 2012. <http://history-world.org/indus_valley.htm>. 

Hays, Jeffrey. "Facts and Details." MESOPOTAMIAN GOVERNMENT AND JUSTICE SYSTEM. N.p., Mar. 2011. Web. 04 Oct. 2012. <http://factsanddetails.com/world.php?itemid=1517>. 

Holland, Julian, ed. The Kingfisher History Encyclopedia. 1st ed. New York: Kingfisher, 1999. Print. 

No Author. "Mesopotamia: Law & Government." Mesopotamia: Law & Government. N.p., no date. Web. 04 Oct. 2012. <http://oi.uchicago.edu/OI/MUS/ED/TRC/MESO/law.html>. 

No Author. "Shang Dynasty." N.p., no date. Web. 5 Oct. 2012. <http://www.aasd.k12.wi.us/Staff/Hermansenjoel/World%20History%20Files/China/dynasty/wilson.htm>. 

No Author. "SPICE." China Digests -. Stanford University, no date. Web. 05 Oct. 2012. <http://spice.stanford.edu/docs/china_digests/>. 

Smitha, Frank E. "Egypt to 2130 BCE." Egypt to 2130 BCE. MacroHistory and World Report, 1998-2011. Web. 05 Oct. 2012. <http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch02egypt.htm>. 

No Author. "The Indus River Valley Civilization." Socyberty. N.p., 6 June 2009. Web. 05 Oct. 2012. <http://socyberty.com/history/the-indus-river-valley-civilization/>. 

Wikapiedia. "Ancient Egypt." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 10 Mar. 2012. Web. 05 Oct. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egypt>.


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.